Thursday, March 12, 2009

CC from the facebook group:

*tomorrow night (3/12) at 6:00 in huntsville we're getting together to get work done for the installation and we're bringing food so that it won't all be work. If you can/want to come send a message. Also, post what food you're bringing so that it wont all be cookies again.*

If you can come and/or bring food, post on the facebook group.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

below this is the full chart layed out in logic form
here are the brainstorm, basic objects we came up with

sci/reason/fact/obj
  • books
  • tape measure
  • microscope
  • judges scale - something acting as weight
  • briefcase
  • tacklebox
  • calculator

fact dep/acad/evidence

  • crutch
  • stockticker w/ reason
  • receipt w/ reason instead of prices
  • list of #s
  • abacus

thought driven/reason based/info sorting

  • sextant
  • compass
  • tacklebox
  • separating meat parts
  • swiss army knife
  • calculator
  • computor
  • circuitry
  • binary code
  • robot
  • dominoes

long term

  • safe

thought/actions calculative

  • chess

realist

  • alarm clock, stopwatch
  • pregnancy test
  • preg test as clock hands
  • object on display in glass/on stand

supersitious

  • umbrella
  • umbrella under house
  • voodoo doll
  • fortune teller
  • deck of cards
  • bingo
  • dice
  • refragmented object
  • monolith
  • totem/rune
  • gnome

intuitive

  • divining rod
  • military experience rank patches
  • third eye
  • cooking

emotion driven

  • thermometer
  • weathervane
  • volcano
  • water/fluid
  • letters

term logic chart


Sunday, March 1, 2009

update on word list and questions

terms: this list is not quite finalized. as we were coming up with these terms, we started sort of organizing them and grouping like ones together, etc. what we ended up with is essentially a matrix with two axes. one axis is divided into religious/secular and the other is divided into scientific/irrational i'm listing these "big 4" in bold and then all the terms that fall under them.
subjective/irrational/illogical/superstitious
emotion/feeling-driven
intuitive
impulsive/short-term planner
ignorant
idealist
optomistic in the naive sense (by belief)
pessimistic
naive
objective/scientific/reason/fact-oriented
thought-driven/reason-based decisions/internal fact-grouping
deductive reasoning
inductive reasoning
optomistic by choice
fact-dependent/logic-dependent/academic/needs proof
actions are calculative
long-term planner
realist (results oriented)
realist (openness - to information/ideas; opposite of ignorant)
secular/internal has the most value
subjective truth
personal ethics/utility-based
ok to lie if...
ego-centric
apathetic
nihilistic
religious/existence of something outside self that is greater than self
absolute truth
morals which are self-legitimizing/self-justifying
never ok to lie
systems-oriented (social systems)/concerned with independent reality
value
selfless

the questions we created by asking them to make a choice which orients them on the religious/secular axis and then to explain their reasoning, which orients them on the subjective/objective axis.

1. pick the statement with which you agree the most. explain your reasoning:
- no aid should be given to the popor in a community; all members should provide for themselves
- a moderate, mostly sufficient amount of aid should be given to the poor in the community at the discretion of indiviudals in the community
- the poor in the community should be guaranteed a large portion of aid at the involuntary cost of the rest of the community
2. pick the statement with which you agree the most. explain your reasoning:
- you have absolute right to do anything to your body at any time
- you have the right to do anything to your body as long as it doesn't affect others
- you have the right to do anything to your body as long as it does result in physical or mental detriment to yourself
3. pick the statement with which you agree the most. explain your reasoning:
- it's never okay to steal
- it's okay to steal if no one suffers obvious loss
- it's okay to steal if there is obvious loss, but also strong need
- it's okay to steal if no one prevents you from doing so
4. pick the statement with which you agree the most. explain your reasoning:
- it's never okay to kill
- it's okay to kill in the case of self-defense
- it's okay to kill if in retribution for past crimes
- it's okay to kill if to prevent more deaths
5. pick the statement with which you agree the most. explain your reasoning:
- truth is absolute
- truth is relative to time
- truth is relative to society/culture
- truth is relative to individuals
- there is no truth
6. order the following by their importance, from most important to least: [i didn't get a chance to copy down this question, because christina came up with it left early, but i'll get all the options. it's like family, benevolence, education, etc.]

we'll be conducting interviews in the lsc mall area tuesday march 3rd, and probably a time or two after that as well. drag your friends by. :)